Publications & Preprints

QDL Publications (Framework-first ordering)

This page is organized to reflect the recommended reading order: canonical framework definitionstructural reconstructionprediction filtertechnical rigorreal-world application. Domain applications follow after the framework core.

Top 5 = clean entry path
Executed benchmarks = auditable method records
Applications = hypotheses + proposed tests
All items are versioned Zenodo DOIs (unless otherwise labeled)
Book / Monograph — reader-facing synthesis
Formal record — remains in Zenodo + journals
The Quantized Dimensional Ledger: A Structural Framework for Dimensional Coherence in Physics
Bourassa, J. D. (2026). Kindle Edition (Amazon). ASIN: B0GHZJHT36

This book is a reader-facing synthesis of the QDL program. It is intended to improve accessibility and narrative continuity. The canonical definitions, benchmarks, and falsifiability conditions remain documented in the DOI-backed Zenodo and journal records listed below.

How to read this list (legend)
Canonical: definitions + core method
Executed benchmark record: methodological, auditable
Application / hypothesis: downstream use + proposed tests
Executed benchmarks are designed for replication and model adequacy testing using public data. They are conservative by design: no new physical effects are claimed; residual structure is the primary diagnostic.
Applications (cosmology, unified SM+gravity, SMEFT, phenomenology) are best read after the Top 5 and should be treated as hypothesis-driven work that stands or falls by testable predictions and benchmarks.

If you want the shortest, least ambiguous entry: start with Top 5, then skim Executed benchmarks, then branch into applications.

Top 5 (Framework-first Core Path)

Recommended “front door” into QDL: definitions → reconstruction → method → rigor → application.

#1 Canonical Definition Validation layer Model admissibility

Dimensional Closure as a National-Scale Model Validation Layer: From Dimensional Analysis to Prediction Filtering, Measurement Auditability, and Interoperable Trust

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17979789

Canonical definition of QDL as an admissibility and validation framework independent of any single application. If you only read one “definition” paper first, it’s this one.

#2 Canonical Reconstruction Dimensional analysis Foundations

The Quantized Dimensional Ledger: A Structural Reconstruction of Dimensional Analysis and Its Role in Modern Physics

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17882709

Reframes dimensional analysis from bookkeeping into a structural rule set; motivates the ledger viewpoint and establishes the bridge from “units” to “admissibility constraints.”

#3 Canonical Core method Prediction filter EFT / constants / gravity / metrology

The Quantized Dimensional Ledger as a Prediction Filter for Field Content, EFT Structure, Constants, Gravity, and Precision Measurement

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17848782

Core method paper: applies closure to filter admissible field content and operator structure while linking constant combinations, gravity sectors, and precision measurement under the same ledger constraint.

#4 Canonical Technical rigor Renormalization Operator pruning

Ledger-Constrained Renormalization: Operator Pruning and Discrete RG Structure from Dimensional Closure

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18025072

Technical anchor: demonstrates how closure constraints act directly on RG structure and operator admissibility, sharpening the “filter” idea into an explicit pruning rule set.

#5 Canonical Applied Engineering Measurement pipelines

Dimensional-Closure Auditing for Engineering Models and Measurement Pipelines: A Ledger-Based Pre-Verification Method with Fusion Energy Case Studies

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18025343

Demonstrates how QDL-style closure becomes a practical pre-verification layer in real modeling pipelines, emphasizing auditability and measurement-aware validation.

The rest of this page groups additional work by topic. These are valuable, but the Top 5 above is the cleanest framework-first entrance and should match the ordering used on the Home page.

Executed Benchmarks & Null Tests (Records)

Auditable benchmark records designed for replication using public data. Focus: residual structure and model adequacy (not effect claims).

Executed benchmark record Framework / torsion anchor Null-test discipline

Benchmarks & Null Tests (Framework / Torsion Anchor)

Zenodo record DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18057668

Establishes the residual-first benchmarking protocol and provides executed null-test anchors for precision datasets where a declared reduced family is expected to pass if no additional structure is present.

Executed benchmark record NV-center ODMR Public data

NV-Center ODMR Benchmark (Residual-first)

Zenodo record DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18069870

Residual-first benchmarking comparing a baseline spin-Hamiltonian family with a strictly reduced comparison family using public ODMR data, emphasizing transparency and structural adequacy rather than fit magnitude alone.

Executed benchmark record Optical cavity Public data

Optical Cavity Trace Benchmark (Residual-first)

Zenodo record DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18076864

Residual-first diagnostics distinguish stabilized traces (noise-like residuals under the reduced family) from uncontrolled resonance scans (coherent residual structure persists under both reduced and low-order baseline families).

These records are intentionally conservative and portable: they provide a clean external “audit handle” on the analysis discipline (provenance, declared preprocessing, declared model families, and residual plots). For the narrative overview, see Experiments → Benchmarks.

Core Framework & Geometry (Beyond Top 5)

Additional framework papers on QDC geometry, minimum-length structure, and the ledger’s geometric interpretation.

Application / hypothesis Minimum-length Dimensional coherence Gravity sector

Quantum Gravity from Dimensional Coherence: Minimum-Length Geometry from the Quantized Dimensional Ledger

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17848573

Develops a gravitational sector in which dimensional coherence under QDL motivates a minimum-length geometry and coherence conditions tied back to QDC structure. Best read after the Top 5.

Core structure QDC geometry SO(3,2)

The Quantized Dimensional Cell as an SO(3,2) Space–Time Structure

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17683786

Treats the QDC as a geometric object (not merely unit choice), motivating the link between ledger exponents and a higher-dimensional space–time–frequency interpretation.

Unified Standard Model + Gravity

Papers applying the closure framework to field content across the Standard Model and gravity sectors.

Application / hypothesis Unified closure SM + gravity Field content

Quantized Dimensional Ledger as a Unified Dimensional Closure Framework for the Standard Model and Gravity

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17742903

Unifies Standard Model fields and a scalar–tensor gravity sector under a common closure rule, embedding fields, couplings, and constants in a shared ledger that closes onto a QDC.

Earlier development Scalar–tensor

A Unified Ledger-Based Framework for Physical Theories: From Dimensional Cells to Scalar–Tensor Field Structure

Bourassa, J. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17704896

Earlier scalar–tensor development from QDC and closure. Useful for historical continuity and derivations, while the framework-first Top 5 remains the recommended entry path.

EFT, SMEFT & Magnetic-Moment Structure

Applications of ledger closure to operator lattices, SMEFT operator sets, and magnetic-moment structure.

Application / hypothesis EFT lattice Operator space Closure constraints

Dimensional Closure and Ledger Lattices in Effective Field Theories

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17773324

Develops EFT operator space as a ledger lattice constrained by closure, organizing admissible operators, exclusions, and dimensional relations among couplings and constants.

Application / hypothesis SMEFT Operator exclusions Wilson relations

Ledger-Closure Constraints on the SMEFT: A Lattice-Theoretic Derivation of Operator Exclusions and Wilson-Coefficient Relations

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17780443

Applies closure rules to SMEFT, deriving structured operator exclusions and relations among Wilson coefficients, with the prediction-filter framework as the guiding principle.

Application / hypothesis g–2 Magnetic moments Ledger geometry

The Ledger Geometry of Magnetic Moments: A Quantized Dimensional Ledger Derivation of the Electron and Muon g–2 Factors

Bourassa, J. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17693061

Reinterprets electron and muon anomalous magnetic moments in terms of ledger geometry and dimensional flow, connecting corrections to QDL structure.

Metrology & Constants

Papers tying metrology practice, measurement chains, and physical constants to the QDL ledger and closure principle.

Core metrology QMU ledger Metrology Constants

The Quantized Dimensional Ledger for Metrology: Dimensional Closure, QMU Ledgers, and the Ontology of Physical Constants

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17619526

Introduces the Quantized Measurement Unit (QMU) ledger as a dimensional audit tool, classifying physical constants and linking metrology practice directly to closure and the conserved QDC.

Ontology Constants Closure classes

A Dimensional Closure Framework for the Ontology of Physical Constants

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17663436

Examines which constants reflect structural geometry versus unit choice, and how closure organizes constant combinations into quantized dimensional classes.

Technical 5D ledger basis Constraints

Structural Constraints on Fundamental Constants from a Five-Dimensional Ledger Basis

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17663501

Derives constraints on fundamental constants using a five-dimensional ledger basis, serving as a more technical complement to the metrology and ontology papers.

Cosmology (Applications)

Cosmology is treated as a downstream application domain once the framework core is established.

Application / hypothesis Cosmology Expansion

Cosmological Expansion from Dimensional Closure: Phase Inertia and Curvature Tension without Independent Dark Sectors

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.18024594

Applies dimensional-closure constraints to cosmological dynamics (phase inertia / curvature tension) as a downstream application of the framework-first program.

Application / hypothesis Cosmology Ledger fields

Ledger-Constrained Cosmology: Dark-Sector Dynamics from Coherent Ledger Fields and QDC Closure

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17956687

Cosmology application built around coherent ledger fields and QDC closure. Recommended after the Top 5 and Coherent Ledger Fields.

Phenomenology & Experiments

Coherent ledger fields, experimental roadmaps, and teaching-oriented laboratory introductions.

Application / hypothesis Phenomenology Scalar–tensor–EM Signals

Coherent Ledger Fields: From SO(3,2) Dimensional Cells to a Unified Scalar–Tensor–Electromagnetic Phenomenology

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17803804

Connects QDC/ledger geometry to scalar–tensor–EM phenomenology and proposes signals in torsion balances, NV centers, cavity scaling, metamaterials, and magnetic-moment structure.

Roadmap Experimental protocol Falsifiability

QDL Experimental Validation Protocol: A Unified Roadmap for Torsion, NV-Center, Cavity, and Metamaterial Tests

Bourassa, J. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17654442

Falsifiable validation program across four independent platforms designed to probe whether physical scaling follows a QDL-governed ledger. For executed benchmark records using public data, see Executed Benchmarks.

Teaching Cavity lab L–F basis

Teaching Dimensional Analysis with a Length–Frequency Basis: An Inverse-Length Cavity Scaling Lab

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17663340

Teaching-focused laboratory framework demonstrating the L–F dimensional basis and resonance scaling as a gentle entry into the ledger idea.

Cross-domain math Toroidal coords

Toroidal Coordinate Representation of the Schrödinger Equation with Cross-Domain Structural Applications

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17663608

Toroidal-coordinate formulation with structural links to QDL geometry; included as an auxiliary mathematical toolset.

Program Synthesis & Overviews

Big-picture documents that map QDL across domains. Best read after the Top 5.

Overview Roadmap Synthesis

QDL: Twenty Grand Challenges, One Ledger – A Unified Dimensional-Closure Architecture for Spacetime, Fields, Constants, Cosmology, Nuclear Structure, Precision Physics, and Measurement

Bourassa, J. D. (2025). Zenodo. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17805400

Programmatic overview mapping dimensional-closure architecture onto a large set of domains and research questions, serving as a roadmap document.

A complete, up-to-date list of QDL manuscripts is maintained via the Zenodo community: zenodo.org/communities/qdl-physics-institute/ . This Publications page emphasizes the framework-first path and highlights executed benchmark records separately for clarity.